
Can someone witness my Will over the Internet?
Introduction
Under the Wills Act 1837, two witnesses were required to be in the physical presence of the testator for a valid will. Due to COVID-19, social distancing, and the constraints on movement, the signing of wills could not be witnessed, in the presence of the testator. The government introduced a statutory instrument which temporarily changed the Wills Act 1837, and allowed the witnessing of wills, to take place using video-conferencing technology. This article explores the requirements and potential problems of witnessing wills over the internet.
What are the Requirements for Witnessing Wills Over the Internet?
The new legislation will apply to wills made since 31 January 2020, unless the grant of probate has already been issued, or an application has already been administered. The testator, and their two witnesses, must each have a clear line of sight, of the writing of the signature. There must be no undue influence. The testator and witnesses must have capacity. A witness cannot be a beneficiary. The testator must see and be seen by the witnesses, and show them the will and permit them to watch them sign the will. They must confirm they have seen and understand the process. The will must be sent to both witnesses. Both witnesses need to see and be seen by the testator, and each other, when they sign. They must acknowledge they have seen it, to each other. Signatures must still be made on paper. The will should contain an attestation clause, stating the method of signature and witnessing, and details of any recording. The will should be returned for safe keeping. The legislation has a time limit of the 31st January 2022. After this deadline, the requirement for physical presence will return.
What are the Potential Problems?
There are concerns that wills witnessed over the internet could result in undue influence. Someone could compel a testator, to make a will in their favour, and easily avoid being seen by a video camera. The online process will take longer than making a traditional will which could increase the cost. The length of time could result in someone dying before the completion of the will. There could be issues with internet connection and if the recording is not of adequate quality, to prove the signing, then the will may not be valid.
Conclusion
It is clear that the new reforms, which are in line with Scotland, Canada and the US, will mitigate practical difficulties, that the public have experienced, when making wills in the COVID-19 era. However, the potential pitfalls of cost, time and undue influence suggest online wills are rather risky. We strongly advise to firstly discuss your case with a solicitor and explore what could be done.
This article is for the information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contact us today for further information or to request a copy of our handy guide “How to safely witness Wills when you are self-isolating”.
Photo by Leon Seibert on Unsplash
Quality | Integrity | Law
Read More

What are digital legacies in wills and why they are important?
The rise of internet users has dramatically increased over the past decade, with Facebook being the first social media network to hold 1 billion registered accounts in its database.[1] This figure shows how crucial it is to make arrangements for any digital legacies during your lifetime.
Digital legacies
A digital legacy is the information that is available concerning an individual after their death. The type of digital legacies may include:
- Photos
- Videos
- Blogs
- Websites
- Gaming accounts
- Social media profiles
- Any other information stored online and all interaction that an individual has with another over the internet is also included.
If a person posts a comment on someone’s Instagram post, this information can be used to form part of a digital legacy and so it is not always straightforward to determine how this piece of information can be used after death. Every company will have its own terms and conditions as to how an account is run and it can be exhausting trying to get a hold of social media sites to inform them of the bereavement. This is why MLS advises clients to make a list of all their digital information, whether it is personal or financial.
Ownership of digital legacies after death
After an individual dies, digital legacies are usually owned by the beneficiary of the will and the online services that store the information. It is a good idea to read up on the end of life policies that each website/provider has in place to ensure that you put all the right procedures in place. For example, Twitter’s policy on this matter includes assisting family members or other authorised individuals with recording a death. They require information such as information about the deceased, a copy of the family member’s ID, and a copy of the deceased’s death certificate in order to close the account. Under no circumstances do they allow anyone access to the deceased individual’s accounts, which means that precious moments may be lost forever if they are not backed up beforehand. There are a number of websites that provide free information and resources on this issue like The Digital Legacy Association and Dying Matters who have Social Media Will templates available to use.
Helpful tips
- Free services like LastPass manage all your online accounts and passwords in once place, which could be useful for the executor of the will to look at.
- Check Google’s Inactive Account Manager to control who your information should be passed on to after death.
- Keep a record of accounts that generate income such as YouTube, monetised blogs or PayPal so you can decide who will benefit from these.
- Memorialisation- Some social media sites like Facebook have an option to memorialise a deceased individual where friends and family members can share memories of that person.
For more information on digital legacies and what to include in a will, contact us on 01244 478730 or email us at hello@my-local-solicitor.com.
Written by: Mahum Fatima
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
Read More

The Grounds for Divorce (MLS Junior Jessie Smith explains)
There is only one ground for divorce and that is that your marriage has irretrievably broken down. There are however, five possible factors you can base this ground on. Essentially, it is five different ways to prove the marriage has broken down. These five factors are: adultery, unreasonable behaviour, dissertation, two-year separation with consent and lastly five-year separation (consent not necessary).
Adultery:
The rules around adultery can be found under s.1(2)(a) of the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA). This has to be voluntary sexual intercourse between a man and a woman who are not married to each other but one of them are married to someone else. The petitioner has to find that the spouse is intolerable to live with after he or she has found out about the adultery. If it is found that the couple have lived together for a period of 6 months or more after the petitioner found out about the adultery, a divorce cannot be granted on this basis. As you can imagine, this is probably the messiest reasoning behind a divorce but quite difficult if the spouse hasn’t admitted to the adultery.
Unreasonable behaviour:
This can be argued to be the most straightforward ground for the breaking down of a marriage. This is because it is quite vague and actually only requires a low standard of unreasonable behaviour. It can also be used when other grounds cannot apply. For example, for adultery there has to be sexual intercourse. With unreasonable behaviour, if your spouse has done sexual acts with someone else that isn’t intercourse adultery can’t be used but unreasonable behaviour can. Also, unlike adultery, the petitioner and their spouse can go on living together and still file for divorce. The court uses a subjective and objective test under s.1(2)(b) to determine unreasonable behaviour which is “Would a right-thinking person think the petitioner could not be reasonable expected to live with the respondent taking into account their personalities?”.
Desertion:
Under s.1(2)(c) MCA the elements are set out for divorce on the basis of desertion. Cohabitation has to of ended with intent by the spouse. The petitioner must not have consented to this and there must have been no reasonable cause to withdraw from cohabitation.
Two-year separation with consent:
For this basis of divorce under s.1(2)(D) MCA, the couple can be separated and living under the same roof. However, they must be living separate lives for at least two years, for the divorce to be granted. The separation starts when one party believes the marriage has come to an end.
Five-year separation:
Under s.1(2)(e) MCA, if you and your spouse have been separated for five years or more, you will be able to file for divorce even if your spouse doesn’t agree too it. The respondent can prevent the divorce from being granted If the divorce would cause the respondent grave hardship, but this hardship must be caused by the marriage ending and not the breakdown.
Written by Jessie Smith
This article is for information only and does not constitute legal advice.
Contact us on 01244 478 730. We are here to help
Photo by Zoriana Stakhniv on Unsplash
Read More